On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:09, Curtis Bruneau<[email protected]> wrote:
> Each SSL site pretty much needs to be on it's own IP address, the
> reasoning is the cert negotiation isn't name based header as apache
> would. The only other way would be to have them on different ports but
> then you'd have to specify the port when going to the site.

In practice yes, but technically no. SNI allows https to do name-based
virtual hosts,
although mod_ssl (and older browsers) do not support it. For this reason we use
mod_gnutls. http://www.outoforder.cc/projects/apache/mod_gnutls/sni/
-- 
Cambridge Energy Alliance: Save money. Save the planet.
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [email protected]


Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com

Reply via email to