On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:38:18AM -0500, Kevin Falcone wrote: > Pull d9ab3597c6193ac82d93bc7882c06f8eab7cbc86 out of the git repo > > > Also I would like to advise against patching package-installed files > > directly in this way -- it's a very good way of getting confused as to > > which version of the software you have installed. I will happily supply > > a test package if required. > > Unfortunately, without rebuilding a .deb and making that available, > this seems the easiest way for someone to test the patch.
Yeah, it's a difficult problem. I'll try and build a package with this patch later on this evening in any case, in case that helps. Another suggestion would be to give instructions that result in a file in /usr/local/request-tracker3.6/lib instead. > > Thanks for looking at this, and sorry that I haven't been able to be > > more proactive. > > I believe this will fix the report against lenny's request-tracker3.6, > but I have no idea what is going on with etch's request-tracker3.6 and > am unlikely to be able to install an etch system to test. The bug > report in the debian tracker sounded like mismatched url/cookies Okay, thanks. Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves, Systems Development and Support Team Computing Services, University of Oxford
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [email protected] Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
