Todd, My experience with this is to set the 'Main Type" of links at the first level to "Members" with the "Show as Well" set for *the other types;*"Members of", "DependsOn" & "Refers To" only and set the levels for however many level I need. Then I leave the lower levels alone. If I want lower level *info* to display in an info box for a ticket, then I check that info at the lower levels. I find that WAAAYYY TOOO Busy. All I want is the ticket numbers and their relationships to all levels (in other words .. arrows only) and this seems to work for me. I have found that the less I check at any lower level, the better it looks.
Hope this helps. Kenn LBNL On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Todd Chapman <[email protected]> wrote: > Does anyone have some insight into this? Any help is appreciated. > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Todd Chapman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am trying to understand ticket graphing behavior. Example ticket > relations: > > > > A -> RefersTo -> B -> DependsOn -> C > > > > If you graph A with "Show as well" selecting ALL link types and "Main > > type of links" set to "RefersTo" then all 3 tickets a graphed. > > > > If you graph A with "Show as well" selecting ALL link types and "Main > > type of links" set to ANY other link type, only A and B are graphed. > > > > What is meant by "Main type of links" and why does it affect graphing > like this? > > > > My goal is to graph all tickets related to the main ticket, now matter > > what link type or an what link depth. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -Todd > > >
