Hi Kevin
we started with 3.4.6in 2004
moved to 3.6.10 in December 2009
moved to 3.8.8 in December 2010
I suspect those searches are old, maybe before the move to 3.6.10
I don't have a patch to submit.
For the moment I just changed
opt/rt3/local/plugins/RT-Extension-MobileUI/html/m/_elements/menu
from
foreach my $search (@searches) {
next unless $search->SubValue("SearchType") eq 'Ticket';
to
foreach my $search (@searches) {
$RT::Logger->info( "SavedSearched '" . $search->Description,
"' 'SearchType' : '" . $search->SubValue("SearchType") . "'" );
next unless $search->SubValue("SearchType") eq 'Ticket';
I found a workaround : renaming the Searches.
Just resaving the Search without changing its name does not seem to be
enough.
Thanks
Gerard
On 2011-03-15 14:34, Kevin Falcone wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 07:59:29PM +0100, Gerard FENELON wrote:
Apparently for the missing Searches
$search->SubValue("SearchType") returns ''
Did I miss a step when upgrading ?
Out of curiosity, what version did you upgrade from?
Most code in RT protects against empty SearchTypes, but it sounds
like this code missed it.
Can you resubmit that as a patch so it can be applied to the extension
and to 4.0?
Thanks
-kevin
On 2011-03-14 17:50, Gerard FENELON wrote:
Hi
I am experimenting with RT-Extension-MobileUI 1.01 on RT 3.8.8.
I am surprised by the Saved Searches on the home page.
The Home page lists 8 Saved Searches
whereas when I go to the Search Builder I have 13.
I don't see any commonality between the shown Saved Searches
or between the unshown Saved Searches.
Privacy does not seem to influence this :
I am missing some but not all searches from "My Saved Searches"
and also missing some but not all searches from "MyCompany
Everybody's saved searches"
(I have a group called "MyCompany Everybody")
Another of my colleagues sees the same thing :
she sees only 2 searches from the 5 "MyCompany Everybody's saved
searches".
(the same as me).
She does not see any searches from her 6 "My Saved Searches".
She does not see any searches from the 3 with yet another privacy.
Has anyone had a similar issue ?
Regards
Gerard
