On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 11:09:11AM +0200, Lars Braeuer wrote:
> thanks for pointing that out. I just noticed that Ruslan replied to me 
> off-list, so we were
> already talking about that.
> 
> He noted, that one might run into problems, when a ticket starts with 
> something else than type
> "Create". Do you think this is not an issue?

You still want a Create action.  It is possible to have a Create
action with no content (which is what the extension I referred to
would allow).

> Another option, probably the best at the moment in order to fix already 
> present tickets with
> intended comments in the intitial ticket create, would be to copy the initial 
> attachment of the
> Create type into a new attachment and add a new transaction with the time of 
> the Create
> transaction +1 second. After that the initial create attachment could be 
> cleared.
> As far as I can see it works fine, because the transactions are sorted by 
> timestamp and not by ID.
> Is this something that might change in the future?

That sounds like a lot of surgery.  Be careful.  It's impossible to
guarantee or warranty that a large amount of tweaking in the database
like that won't cause problems.

-kevin

Attachment: pgpNbJQsrGFf8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--------
RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  San Francisco, CA, USA — October 18 & 19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA — October 31 & November 1, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain — November 28 & 29, 2011

Reply via email to