I'll make an initial concept of a structure with some additional explanation on what I have in mind.
Should be done tomorrow I think. -- Bart Op 29 november 2011 15:41 schreef Jay Ashworth <[email protected]> het volgende: > I was one of the early contributors in that post, about 5 years ago, and > while I'm about to redeploy 4.0 as a test, I haven't been using RT much in > the interim; I admit I spent more time on content than categorization, > though. > > Categories are handy. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ruslan Zakirov" <[email protected]> > > To: "Bart" <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 6:31:07 AM > > Subject: Re: [rt-users] The RT Wiki - Restructure (start using > categories?) > > Hello Bart, > > > > It would be great to see more structure on the wiki. I think "wiki > > chief editor" position is vacant, unfortunately it's not paid, but > > much appreciated. > > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Bart <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've created an account on Wikia in order to do some editing on the > > > RT wiki: > > > > > > http://requesttracker.wikia.com/wiki/HomePage > > > > > > There are a few things that I want to add, but I'm kinda confused by > > > the > > > structure O_o > > > > > > I've noticed that only a handfull of articles contain a categorie, > > > these > > > categories are viewable on this page: > > > > > > http://requesttracker.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Categories > > > > > > These categories are a nice way of structuring content, people only > > > have to > > > add a page with the proper categorie and it will be displayed on the > > > categorie page. > > > In addition you have the ability to add specific > > > information/explanation to > > > each categorie page as shown on this page: > > > > > > http://requesttracker.wikia.com/wiki/Category:3.8.9 > > > > > > The thing I'm missing on the main page is a link to all categories, > > > this > > > would make browsing the wiki allot easier. > > > In addition what I'm missing is a structure of the categories + > > > allot of > > > pages aren't categorized. > > > > > > I feel that the structure could be better, and with a better > > > structure it > > > would make adding articles allot easier + they will become visible > > > by simply > > > viewing a categorie specific page where everything is alphabetized > > > (no need > > > for creating a link to article X on certain pages). > > > > > > If I were to think-up a structure and start to re-organize the > > > categories > > > (edit pages to point to the new structure), would this upset someone > > > (I hope > > > not ^_^)? > > > I'd first want to roughly draw the categorie structure and verify it > > > with > > > the mailing-lists before starting to edit anything. (basically think > > > before > > > act) > > > > > > Let me know your thoughts, I feel that I have some time to work on > > > the wiki > > > so hopefully with some input from others it will be possible to > > > freshen up > > > the wiki. > > > > > > > > > -- Bart > > > > > > -------- > > > RT Training Sessions > > > (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) > > > * Boston — TBA > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, Ruslan. > > -------- > > RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) > > * Boston TBA > > -- > Jay R. Ashworth Baylink > [email protected] > Designer The Things I Think RFC > 2100 > Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land > Rover DII > St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 > 1274 > -------- > RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) > * Boston TBA >
-------- RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Boston TBA
