Le 24/08/2016 à 01:35, Alex Hall a écrit :
> 
> 
> * In OST, agents (that is, staff who can take care of tickets and make 
> internal notes) must belong to one department only. We can use multiple 
> teams, but those are harder to deal with than departments.. In RT, can staff 
> belong to multiple departments, assuming RT has a similar setup?
> 

users may be in multiple groups (teams). And may have rights and roles
(works) on multiple queues (team+workflow). So yes.

> * Can SLAs be set to ignore weekends and holidays? If a 72-hour SLA is 
> assigned on Friday, that should mean three business days, not that it has to 
> be done Monday.
> 

yes, see
https://docs.bestpractical.com/rt/4.4.1/customizing/sla.html#Does-business-time-support-holidays

> * Can things be set so that staff are notified upon certain events firing? A 
> very overdue ticket in any department might go to one guy in management 
> automatically, for instance, so that he can keep tabs on all overdue items.
> 

yes, using rt-crontool you can do automatic escalation. You can also use
saved searches with relative dates and dashboards subscriptions.

> * Can we use custom IMAP folders? I had to modify OSTicket to do this, but we 
> have just tick...@domain.com for our email address for the system. It's with 
> Gmail, so I have tickets+graph...@domain.com set to go to Graphics. I did 
> this by telling Graphics to check the 'graphics' folder in the tickets email 
> account. Each department has the same setup, with a custom folder. We did 
> this because each new email address costs money, and we saw no point in 
> paying hundreds per year for a feature I could add to OST. RT will have to be 
> able to do the same, though.
> 

best use of RT is usually to directly send email to him using smtp, but
you can use fetchmail to get emails from pop/imap/...

> * In OST, replying to an email notification posts only an internal comment, 
> not a full ticket reply. OST says they do this so two agents don't reply with 
> conflicting information for the user. For our situation, though, we need 
> email replies to post ticket replies, so everyone on the ticket gets email 
> notifications. Essentially, part of what we want is to let users carry on 
> email conversations surrounding a ticket, but for those responses to be 
> posted to the ticket at the same time. This will keep activity archived, and 
> will automatically create ad-hoc email groups for everyone who needs to be 
> part of a given issue. Since we're not using this for customers, we don't 
> care who sees what in * In OST, when an agent creates a ticket, it *must* be 
> done on behalf of a user. Since most of our tickets are internal, this gets 
> very annoying, and results in us posting tickets to ourselves most of the 
> time. I'd much prefer it if tickets could be opened on behalf of agents or, 
> better still,
>   on beha
>  lf of no one at all. I just want a ticket to consist of the issue, the 
> creator, and everyone who needs to deal with it, plus an SLA.
> 

in RT notification are fully customizables and there is usually to kind
of emails address per queue, one for comments, other for replies.




As you have a great view of what you wan't but litle knowledge of RT
which is higly configurable/customizable, I strongly suggest you to
contact Bestpractical or other RT specialist working near you to help
you so you'll do the rights choices between
queues/customfields/groups/roles for your org.

-- 
Easter-eggs                              Spécialiste GNU/Linux
44-46 rue de l'Ouest  -  75014 Paris  -  France -  Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37    -   Fax: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 76
mailto:elac...@easter-eggs.com  -   http://www.easter-eggs.com
---------
RT 4.4 and RTIR training sessions, and a new workshop day! 
https://bestpractical.com/training
* Boston - October 24-26
* Los Angeles - Q1 2017

Reply via email to