Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 07:25:13PM +0200, Paolo Mantegazza wrote:
same problem with linux-2.4.26 and gcc-3.2
Well 3.2. is one I'm using and see nothing ... with 2.6. So there might
be something defined differently on 2.4s. Strange because if it was the
desc struct it shoul have given a worning for the declaration before of
it also.
I'll try to reinstall 2.4 and check it. It will be next week, I do not
want to stop stress testing for r2.
You don't have to :)
This patch fixes the warning for 2.4 - NOTE: not tested with 2.6
Committed, thanks. Clearly in 2.6 at elast one of the already included
header had it in 2.6.xx and not in 2.4.xx.
Paolo.
