Gedare Bloom wrote:
Well, Chris suggested removing the include eventually.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Sebastian Huber
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2013-07-19 14:56, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Good. Would it make sense for us to have some greppable tag for this
situation where something should be fixed in the following release?
Do we really want to change this in the future?
Applications that need this header should add it themselves and be
dependent on RTEMS to provide it.
Chris
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
