On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello Ashi,
>
> after the weekend I think we can further simplify the Freechain interface.
> The node_size and bump_count are not necessary for the Freechain core
> routines (_Freechain_Get() and _Freechain_Put()). Thus we should also
> remove them. In case the extend handler needs more information you can use
> something like that:
>
> typedef struct {
> Freechain_Control super;
> size_t bump_count;
> } MyFreechain;
>
> bool MyFreechainExtend(Freechain_**Control *super)
> {
> MyFreechain *self = (MyFreechain *) super;
>
> ...
>
> }
>
> Thanks, Sebastian, it's a cool idea! I've update the code to this idea now.
And I also fix a bug in my previous code. In my previous code, the
test_node in test case is:
typedef struct {
Object_Control obj;
int x;
}test_node;
It should be Chain_Node, not Object_Control here. However, because
Object_Control's size is bigger than Chain_Node, the test case doesn't
crash.
The github url is: https://github.com/ashi08104/rtems/tree/add_freelist
--
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail :
> sebastian.huber@embedded-**brains.de<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>
> PGP : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>
Cheers,
Zhongwei
freechain.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
