>________________________________________ >From: ged...@gwmail.gwu.edu [ged...@gwmail.gwu.edu] on behalf of Gedare Bloom >[ged...@rtems.org] >Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 9:19 AM >To: Rempel, Cynthia >Cc: Hesham AL-Matary; rtems-devel@rtems.org >Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libmm score and stubs > >On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Rempel, Cynthia ><cynt6...@vandals.uidaho.edu> wrote: >> Hi Hesham, >> >> Thanks for doing the stubs :) >> Could you pull all the implementation specific parts of mm.h and mm.inl into >> a header called mmimpl.h ? >> It would then match the header-style score is heading towards... >> If the no_memorymanagement.c is for devices without mm support, could you >> have the functions print out a "stub warning/error" message? That way the >> user knows not to rely on memory management... >> >I don't think we should have the stubs do anything in the normal case. Why? >We could add something when RTEMS_DEBUG is enabled.
_______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
