Hi all: I just enabled on my PC autoconf's warnings (in script 'bootstrap', I added "--warnings=all" to the 'autoreconf' invocation), and sure enough I got quite a lot of them.
Is this not an area worth cleaning up? I am generally not a friend of disabling (or not enabling) warnings. There seems to be 2 types of warnings that come up all the time: 1) sp01/Makefile.am:18: warning: user target 'sp01$(EXEEXT)' defined here ... /home/blah...blah/automake-1.13/am/program.am: ... overrides Automake target 'sp01$(EXEEXT)' defined here In that particular case, that's the rule in question: sp01$(EXEEXT): $(sp01_OBJECTS) $(sp01_DEPENDENCIES) @rm -f sp01$(EXEEXT) $(make-exe) I am no autoconf expert, but I guess the configuration is requesting standard program compilation and then defining its own rule about how to build a program. 2) File doc/project.am is redefining TEXI2DVI and the like, which autoconf does not like either. If those redefinitions make sense (I cannot tell myself), I guess the files could use variables with different names. Thanks, rdiez _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
