On 7/26/2013 7:17 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
Sebastian Huber wrote:
What about xyzapi.h, xyzcore.h and xyzimpl.h?
I think xyzcore.h is ok but I do not like xyzapi.h. I feel the 'api'
part in this case is implicit. For example in user code you see would:
#include <xyz.h>
and not:
#include <xyzapi.h>
because it is implicit a user would only be accessing the API. The
standard C library is the same with <string.h> rather than
<stringapi.h>. The C++ std is another example.
Currently we are forced to have other names. Boost uses directories such
impl which is nice because it avoids things like 'armdmacorecore.h'
happening. I think stdc++v3 has bits or something like that.
I would rather add a subdirectory which indicates they are internal
implementation.
Chris
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[email protected] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
