On 2013-08-12 16:11, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: <snip>@@ -59,10 +60,12 @@ void _Scheduler_Handler_initialization( void ); * * This kernel routine implements the scheduling decision logic for * the scheduler. It does NOT dispatch. + * + * @param[in] thread The thread which state changed previously. */ -RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE void _Scheduler_Schedule( void ) +RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE void _Scheduler_Schedule( Thread_Control *thread ) { - _Scheduler.Operations.schedule(); + _Scheduler.Operations.schedule( thread ); }Can this "thread" parameter be used to "Update" the per-thread scheduler metadata and obviate the call to _Scheduler_Update? -Gedare
An optimized version of the current scheduler will use this thread parameter to get some state information.
-- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
