Hello,
After applying the patch that Joel has sent out, there is a new bug that is
occuring in smpatomic tests.
The bug is shown below,
gmake[6]: Entering directory
`/home/harsha/rtems/4.11/pc386/i386-rtems4.11/c/pc386/testsuites/smptests/smpatomic02'
i386-rtems4.11-gcc -B../../../../../pc386/lib/ -specs bsp_specs -qrtems
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../../../../../../../rtems/c/src/../../testsuites/smptests/smpatomic02
-I..
-I../../../../../../../rtems/c/src/../../testsuites/smptests/../support/include
-mtune=i386 -O2 -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wimplicit-function-declaration -Wstrict-prototypes -Wnested-externs -MT
tasks.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/tasks.Tpo -c -o tasks.o
../../../../../../../rtems/c/src/../../testsuites/smptests/smpatomic02/tasks.c
In file included from
../../../../../pc386/lib/include/rtems/score/cpuatomic.h:29:0,
from
../../../../../pc386/lib/include/rtems/score/atomic.h:21,
from
../../../../../pc386/lib/include/rtems/rtems/atomic.h:26,
from
../../../../../../../rtems/c/src/../../testsuites/smptests/smpatomic02/tasks.c:19:
../../../../../pc386/lib/include/rtems/score/cpustdatomic.h: In function
'Test_task':
../../../../../pc386/lib/include/rtems/score/cpustdatomic.h:83:3: error:
invalid memory model for '__atomic_load'
return atomic_load_explicit( object, order );
^
../../../../../pc386/lib/include/rtems/score/cpustdatomic.h:91:3: error:
invalid memory model for '__atomic_load'
return atomic_load_explicit( object, order );
^
gmake[6]: *** [tasks.o] Error 1
gmake[6]: Leaving directory
`/home/harsha/rtems/4.11/pc386/i386-rtems4.11/c/pc386/testsuites/smptests/smpatomic02'
gmake[5]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
Thanks,
Sree
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com>wrote:
> I think the change from #ifdef to #if changed this.
> pc386 set CLOCK_DRIVER_ISRS_PER_TICK to a
> string rather than a numeric value. I added
> CLOCK_DRIVER_ISRS_PER_TICK_**VALUE and
> did some other clean up on the driver.
>
> With the attached patch, it compiles again and
> ticker runs.
>
> Please review and let me know if OK to commit.
>
>
> On 8/16/2013 11:03 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>> OK. If you find the bug in the modified clockdrv_shell.h think about
>> how it might be fixed.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Vipul Nayyar <nayyar_vi...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Will look more closely into the matter.
>>>
>>> FWIW, I compiled the pc386 bsp giving the same configure statement as
>>> Sree
>>> gave, in my personal fork of rtems from github which is about 18 or so
>>> commits behind the master( that means my fork does not contain Sebastian
>>> &
>>> Chris' #define -> #if patches).
>>>
>>> And it compiled successfully, without giving any errors.
>>>
>>> What I feel, is that the following two patches that modified
>>> clockdrv_shell.h need to be checked again..
>>> http://git.rtems.org/rtems/**commit/?id=**b7f206097313f794dbe53202542b58
>>> **94aad6a117<http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=b7f206097313f794dbe53202542b5894aad6a117>
>>> http://git.rtems.org/rtems/**commit/?id=**d473dc0b22d3276130f893a51350c8
>>> **bfb8beaac8<http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=d473dc0b22d3276130f893a51350c8bfb8beaac8>
>>>
>>> My patches for pc386 were checked carefully by Sebastian, but will have
>>> to
>>> look more closely to find any bug caused due to my patches.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Vipul Nayyar
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
> joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
> Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
> Support Available (256) 722-9985
>
>
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
