>________________________________________ >From: rtems-devel-boun...@rtems.org [rtems-devel-boun...@rtems.org] on behalf >of Joel Sherrill [joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com] >Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 6:20 AM >To: Sebastian Huber >Cc: rtems-devel@rtems.org >Subject: Re: Posix Tests Compiler Warnings > >On 8/21/2013 8:05 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> Hello, >> >> before we start here we should first fix the <inttypes.h> provided by Newlib: >> >> http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-devel/2013-August/004055.html >And the Single UNIX Specification for inttypes.h: > >http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604599/basedefs/inttypes.h.html > >RTEMS should have these and whatever extras we have defined in a way that >eliminates the warnings. > >This is actually a tedious issue since you have to define them in a way that >generates no warnings on any architecture. Sounds great:) How would one go about doing this?
>I think there is a test for these >now in the suite. Perhaps it is missing some of these cases. > >But fixing inttypes.h is the answer. It moves us more to POSIX Where in newlib (or rtems) would the fixes take place?.. _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
