Joel Sherrill wrote:
Since I have not looked at the code...
How does the scheduler know to ignore these cores?
The CPU state does not enter UP. I assume this means the core is not
available for scheduling. I have not checked the code to make sure this
happens.
Does the set of cores with RTEMS need to be contiguous?
I hope not. The state should be the overriding factor here.
Any other assumptions, features, or quirks I should have asked about?
Many (he said avoiding the catch all question) ;)
Chris
Chris Johns<chr...@rtems.org> wrote:
Hi,
Set the state of a secondary cpu to shutdown if multitasking returns.
Chris
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
