Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
---
For RTEMS 4.10 branch.
cpukit/libfs/src/devfs/devfs_mknod.c | 9 +++++++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/devfs/devfs_mknod.c
b/cpukit/libfs/src/devfs/devfs_mknod.c
index d8e5a30..6df84a4 100644
--- a/cpukit/libfs/src/devfs/devfs_mknod.c
+++ b/cpukit/libfs/src/devfs/devfs_mknod.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ int devFS_mknod(
{
int i;
int slot;
+ int len;
rtems_device_name_t *device_name_table;
rtems_device_major_number major;
rtems_device_minor_number minor;
@@ -69,8 +70,12 @@ int devFS_mknod(
rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one( ENOMEM );
_ISR_Disable(level);
- device_name_table[slot].device_name = (char *)path;
- device_name_table[slot].device_name_length = strlen(path);
+ len = strlen(path);
+ device_name_table[slot].device_name = (char *)malloc(len);
Is there a free if the node is deleted ?
+ if (!device_name_table[slot].device_name)
+ rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one(ENOMEM);
+ strcpy(device_name_table[slot].device_name, (char *)path);
+ device_name_table[slot].device_name_length = len;
device_name_table[slot].major = major;
device_name_table[slot].minor = minor;
device_name_table[slot].mode = mode;
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
