On 2013-10-14 18:16, Hesham Moustafa wrote:

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Gedare Bloom <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Hesham Moustafa
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
     >
     >
     >
     > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Sebastian Huber
     > <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
     >>
     >> On 2013-10-14 15:34, Hesham AL-Matary wrote:
     >>>
     >>> diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/raspberrypi/startup/mm_config_table.c
     >>> b/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/raspberrypi/startup/mm_config_table.c
     >>> index 5436a76..2b748b2 100644
     >>> --- a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/raspberrypi/startup/mm_config_table.c
     >>> +++ b/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/raspberrypi/startup/mm_config_table.c
     >>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ bsp_mm_config_table[] = {
     >>>     }, {
     >>>       .begin = (uint32_t) bsp_section_text_begin,
     >>>       .end = (uint32_t) bsp_section_text_end,
     >>> -    .flags = ARMV7_MMU_CODE_CACHED
     >>> +    .flags = ARMV7_MMU_READ_WRITE
     >>
     >>
     >> What is the problem with the cache?  Did the cache previously work?
     >
     > There is a problem with applying a Read-Only permissions in general to 
this
     > area for RaspberryPi BSP.
    Any idea why? Letting the text region be read-write is overly
    permissive, as RTEMS does not generally use self-modifying code.

Not sure about the reason, I had to test (i.e., change attributes) every entry 
in
  the table and finally found that this section causes the problem. I could not 
use
other debugging methods because the BSP is new and lacks a driver to remotely
debug, and I could not also use printf as it's a startup code. Maybe this 
section
overlaps other section (as its minimum size is 1 MB and it's aligned)
which is written later (e.g., vector table area). ticker.exe only works with 
this
modification.

You can add a gap between the read-only and read-write sections with the

bsp_section_rwbarrier_align = DEFINED (bsp_section_rwbarrier_align) ? bsp_section_rwbarrier_align : 1M;

symbol which may be provided by the BSP specific linker command file.

You can also use Qemu to debug this problem.


     >>
     >>
     >>
     >>>     }, {
     >>>       .begin = (uint32_t) bsp_section_rodata_begin,
     >>>       .end = (uint32_t) bsp_section_rodata_end,
     >>> @@ -63,8 +63,12 @@ bsp_mm_config_table[] = {
     >>>       .begin = (uint32_t) bsp_section_stack_begin,
     >>>       .end = (uint32_t) bsp_section_stack_end,
     >>>       .flags = MMU_DATA_READ_WRITE
     >>> +  }, {
     >>> +    .begin = 0x20000000,
     >>> +    .end = 0x20FFFFFF,
     >>> +    .flags = ARMV7_MMU_DATA_READ_WRITE
     >>
     >>
     >> What is this for an area?
     >
     > It's for Raspberry GPIO pins and other registers (defined at
     > raspbberrypi.h).

Is this the correct setting for devices?

--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : [email protected]
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel

Reply via email to