On 10/24/2013 03:41 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 2013-10-24 15:15, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
 From code analysis and testing SMP on LEON I can see that when installing a
trap handler the cache is not invalidated correctly on other CPUs then the CPU
installing the new trap handler. In the single-core case this is correct, but
for SMP we must flush all CPUs caches. I think this is a platform independent
problem for all self-modifying code. On the LEON SMP we normally don't see this
since since the bad traps that are installed are never taken.

My suggestion is that we use a IPI to signal to other CPUs to invalidate their
instruction cache, and CPU requesting such a remote CPU(s) flush should wait
until all remote CPUs signal that their cache has been invalidated. The cache
library could be extended to support SMP. Perhaps is should not be a platform
independednt IPI solution, but rather a libcpu/BSP specific implementation for
implementing cache flush on another CPU?

What do think about this issue?

The LEON3 has only an operation that invalidates the complete cache, so here a simple inter-processor event can be used. On other platforms you have to perform invalidation by set/way or address. Here you have to deal with more than one bit of information which makes things a bit more complicated.
Of course, the cache manager should be able to invalidate regions which is mapped down to the whole cache on a LEON. I agree. Note that the LEON behaviour in this regard may not always be limited to the whole cache, it would be a pity to limit it to the first LEON cache model ;)


It seems we need a low-level message queue with a broadcast to all processors 
feature.  We likely need also low-level barrier operations.

Agree.

Daniel
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel

Reply via email to