On 11/01/2013 12:17 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
My original version of this change wrapped it in an RTEMS new stack macro.
Yes, but your original patch is not a huge help since you can simpley use
#define MSIZE 123
#include <sys/param.h>
#include <sys/mbuf.h>
Both ways are a bad hack and can lead to very hard to debug problems if
two modules work with mbufs of different sizes.
Chris Johns<chr...@rtems.org> wrote:
On 1/11/2013 12:11 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>This change is necessary to support IPv6. It affects applications using
>the current network stack of RTEMS since this will half the mbuf count
>in the system.
I am not sure about this change going into 4.11. If the new stack went
in as well that is a different story.
Because of the long time frame between 4.10 and 4.11 (yes some people
have got married and had children), users are having to using 4.11.
Can this sit out of the changes until 4.11 and then go in ?
Ok, we can wait for the 4.11 release.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
