On 2013-11-11 14:14, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 11/11/2013 11:25 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 2013-11-11 02:22, Gedare Bloom wrote:
I think perhaps the scheduler was changed and no longer matches the assumptions
of this test..
Yes, this is the case. I didn't look at the test and relied on the "END OF
TEST" messages which normally indicates a successful test completion. I
removed this test now.
Okay. Thanks.
Generally I have had some problems verifying the test results of the tests. I
would like to log the console output and compare it against the logs in the
.scn files, do you know how this is done? I'm guessing that the CPU printouts
depends on the platform, for example which CPU runs the Init task makes the
printout be different. Do you have a trick on the PPC or is it matching the
console logs? I guess this question is not only a SMP issue.
Unfortunately the RTEMS test suite output is not that useful currently. A test
program should only print out "END OF TEST" if it was successful. Most tests
do this. Some tests (e.g. the smptests/smp06) have bugs and produce false
positives. An open project is to convert the RTEMS test suite to use a unit
test framework with better human and machine readable output.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel