On 11/14/2013 6:06 PM, Maldonado, Sergio E. wrote: > Hello, > > I'm a user of RTEMS 4.10.99 and would like to exercise the parameter > CONFIGURE_HAS_OWN_CONFIGURATION_TABLE as specified in 23.14.2 of the RTEMS C > User's Guide (24 Feb 2013). > > When this parameter is defined, how should a user instantiate the > rtems_configuration_table structure for use by the executive? > > In this release, must the structure be linked in by the user code, or can it > still be passed in as a run time argument?
You almost certainly don't want to do that. :) Why do you think you want to fill inby hand a large and complex data structure that is subject to change with each release? I was the one who added that option and I have considered removing it many times. I just can't see any good use case for exercising it. Prove me wrong. :) > Thank you, > > Sergio Maldonado > > SLAC > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rtems-devel mailing list > rtems-devel@rtems.org > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel > -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985 _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
