I'm good with patches 1 and 2.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Philipp Eppelt
<philipp.epp...@mailbox.tu-dresden.de> wrote:
> ---
> cpukit/aclocal/enable-paravirt.m4 | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> cpukit/configure.ac | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 cpukit/aclocal/enable-paravirt.m4
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/aclocal/enable-paravirt.m4
> b/cpukit/aclocal/enable-paravirt.m4
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ff768f4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/cpukit/aclocal/enable-paravirt.m4
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +AC_DEFUN([RTEMS_ENABLE_PARAVIRT],
> +[
> +
> +AC_ARG_ENABLE(paravirt,
> +[AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-paravirt],[enable support for paravirtualization
> +(i386 only) (default=no) ])],
> +
> +[case "${enableval}" in
> + yes) case "${RTEMS_CPU}" in
> + i386) RTEMS_HAS_PARAVIRT=yes ;;
> + *) RTEMS_HAS_PARAVIRT=no ;;
> + esac
> + ;;
> + no) RTEMS_HAS_PARAVIRT=no ;;
> + *) AC_MSG_ERROR(bad value ${enableval} for enable-paravirt option) ;;
> +esac],[RTEMS_HAS_PARAVIRT=no])
> +])
> diff --git a/cpukit/configure.ac b/cpukit/configure.ac
> index da02f24..e111fdd 100644
> --- a/cpukit/configure.ac
> +++ b/cpukit/configure.ac
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ RTEMS_ENABLE_MULTIPROCESSING
> RTEMS_ENABLE_POSIX
> RTEMS_ENABLE_RTEMS_DEBUG
> RTEMS_ENABLE_NETWORKING
> +RTEMS_ENABLE_PARAVIRT
>
> RTEMS_ENV_RTEMSCPU
> RTEMS_CHECK_RTEMS_DEBUG
> @@ -182,6 +183,11 @@ RTEMS_CPUOPT([RTEMS_SMP],
> [1],
> [if SMP is enabled])
>
> +RTEMS_CPUOPT([RTEMS_PARAVIRT],
> + [test x"$RTEMS_HAS_PARAVIRT" = xyes],
> + [1],
> + [PARAVIRT is enabled])
> +
> RTEMS_CPUOPT([RTEMS_NETWORKING],
> [test x"$rtems_cv_HAS_NETWORKING" = xyes],
> [1],
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-devel mailing list
> rtems-devel@rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
