I was adding it as a GCI task. Hopefully I won't never to write it. :) On Dec 9, 2013 11:56 PM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: On 2013-12-10 02:46, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Module: rtems > Branch: master > Commit: 327fbd6df749c64c9896b61cb7caa80db347df00 > Changeset: > http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=327fbd6df749c64c9896b61cb7caa80db347df00 > > Author: Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com> > Date: Mon Dec 9 15:25:16 2013 -0600 > > condwaitsupp.c: Return EPERM if waiting and mutex is not locked > > This error check was commented out because it is not in the POSIX > specification. However, the GNU/Linux manual page does document > that EPERM is to be returned in this situation.
It would be nice to have a test case for this. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
