I started out with it as one, but because of the way the tests run a lot of data comes out (one line for each comparison). I split them up so each test doesn't output so many screens of data. If I put them back as one, would it be better only print at the top of the test (ex. AND test) then print details upon a failure within that (this doesn't match the way other tests work though)
> -----Original Message----- > From: rtems-devel-boun...@rtems.org [mailto:rtems-devel- > boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Huber > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 1:42 AM > To: rtems-devel@rtems.org > Subject: Re: Fixed size cpusetf patch > > On 2013-12-16 20:17, Jennifer Averett wrote: > > Attached is an patch for a set of tests that checks the fixed size > > functionali8ty in cpuset.h > > > > Any comments, questions, suggestions? > > Do we really need five different test programs. Can't we use one test > program with five test functions? > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > _______________________________________________ > rtems-devel mailing list > rtems-devel@rtems.org > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
