On 1/6/2014 5:14 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 7/01/2014 4:24 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On 1/6/2014 11:13 AM, Philipp Eppelt wrote: >>> Where are we on this? >> I think I was OK on it. If Gedare is also, then it should be merged. >> > How will this change be tested on a regular basis ? As we move to > constant integration testing we need a way to test this code. Philipp.. can you provide us a "test plan"? That is, how you build and test today for what you have. I know that it is likely only a couple of tests at this point from an RTEMS perspective. > I would like to understand how this extra dependency is tested and > managed on an on going basis before getting my support. Agreed. We need to be conscious of this.
Is a test plan sufficient? We don't have the infrastructure currently to automate testing this. I really hope Philipp enjoyed the project and will stay involved and help us grow this. This is an important capability for the growth of RTEMS as a project. We need to lay the groundwork so we can eventually test Pok, help it grow, and ensure its stability. In a perfect world, it would have good test results before we test Pok+RTEMS and put it through our acceptance tests. > Chris -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985 _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
