On 7/02/2014 2:00 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 2014-02-06 15:52, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
On 02/06/2014 03:37 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>On 2014-02-06 15:35, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>Thanks Sebastian. Is there some sim-script support or
documentation on
>>using this BSP with Qemu?
>
>Yes, I will commit this tomorrow. Can't switch branches currently
due to active test runs.
>
It seems that this patch is necessary because qemu/leon3 does
not implement the plug&play feature of leon3, and does not
pre-initialize timers and UARTs. Wouldn't it be simpler to
add the missing features to qemu, rather than add an extra bsp?
Yes, this solution would be better.
I agree.
The problem is that this requires
more work and I don't have a budget for this.
That may be the case but it is not really a concern for the project.
We can of course remove this BSP if QEMU is capable enough some time in
the future.
This is correct however rejecting the patch means fixing qemu is the
best solution and that is in the interest of the project. Adding a bsp
is much easier than removing one even when clearly stated it is
temporary. Hiding issues in work arounds like this is not a good idea.
I prefer seeing qemu get fixed.
Chris
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
