On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com> wrote: > git > On 2/18/2014 1:12 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> Hello Joel, >> >> On 2014-02-17 18:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> Has anyone reviewed the results yet? >> I executed the tests during development of the SMP priority scheduler. All >> tests using unimplemented features fail. > And these are expected fails but is there a list of expected fails? The > impact of > those on coverage evaluated? > > I know our testing framework is poor and in the process of being improved > but this is important information. >>> With at least no-preempt and ISR disable level not honored >>> in the thread mode when SMP is enabled, I would assume >>> multiple tests are expected to break. >>> >> I collected unsupported features in SMP mode here: >> >> http://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/testsuites/smptests/smpunsupported01/init.c >> >> What do you mean with "ISR disable level not honored in the thread mode when >> SMP is enabled"? >> > I misremembered the SMP conditionals in taskmode.c. Only no-preempt is > disabled. > > FWIW It may be better to not build task variables than to just return an > error. That is an entire class of capability that is not supported in > SMP. The tests for that would fail to link and could then just be > disabled from building. > I'd rather leave the tests as failing than to disable them. Eventually they should work if task variables get fixed?
> Disable preemption is more subtle. The tests of rtems_task_mode() > need addressing. But other tests simply will not work. The impact on > coverage is unknown. > > Each feature not supported in SMP needs careful evaluation. > And analysis whether the feature will be supported in the future or if it is uni-processor only. -Gedare > -- > Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development > joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research > Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 > Support Available (256) 722-9985 > > _______________________________________________ > rtems-devel mailing list > rtems-devel@rtems.org > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
