Ok On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 2014-02-19 16:11, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> There is dissimilarity between the SMP handler function names >> * _SMP_Request_processors_to_shutdown >> * _SMP_Request_start_multitasking_on_secondary_processors() >> >> Note the order switch between the verb and object. If you like the >> similar with _Thread_Start_multitasking, I recommend using >> _SMP_Request_shutdown_on_secondary_processors(). >> >> I also do not think it is necessary to include >> "on_secondary_processors()" however. You could just use >> * _SMP_Request_shutdown() > > > The shutdown request affects all processors. This name is better since it > is shorter, i will use it. > >> * _SMP_Request_start_multitasking() > > > This function will be called from the main processor only and the other > processors (= secondary processors) are the targets of this request. > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
