I'd like a plan for removing the checks. Perhaps each release cycle should sweep up these feature checks as the tools get stabilized?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com> wrote: > > On 2/20/2014 3:12 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> Do we do this with other newlib features? > Various configure.ac's have these type of tests in them. I know we > have code which uses them. It is likely other tests do as well. > > We are trying to ease the bump with older tools and minimize the > risk that git bisect can't work. >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Jennifer Averett >> <jennifer.aver...@oarcorp.com> wrote: >>> The attached patch adds the check for cpuset.h in newlib >>> into the cpuset test. >>> >>> Jennifer Averett >>> On-Line Applications Research >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rtems-devel mailing list >>> rtems-devel@rtems.org >>> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> rtems-devel mailing list >> rtems-devel@rtems.org >> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel > > -- > Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development > joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research > Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 > Support Available (256) 722-9985 > _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
