On 10/04/2014 12:54 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
I think we should drop the "smp" and simply use:
rtems_get_current_processor()
rtems_get_processor_count()
I'm good with this, especially with the effort to unify the API as
much as possible for SMP and non-SMP. These functions can have
well-defined semantics on non-smp.
+1
Chris
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
