On 15/04/2014 9:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
---
  cpukit/sapi/include/confdefs.h |    6 ++++++
  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/cpukit/sapi/include/confdefs.h b/cpukit/sapi/include/confdefs.h
index c8a9d0e..8b9b3e1 100644
--- a/cpukit/sapi/include/confdefs.h
+++ b/cpukit/sapi/include/confdefs.h
@@ -1583,6 +1583,12 @@ const rtems_libio_helper rtems_fs_init_helper =
   * classic or posix objects that have not already been given resource limits.
   */
  #if defined(CONFIGURE_UNLIMITED_OBJECTS)
+  #if !defined(CONFIGURE_UNIFIED_WORK_AREAS) && \
+     !defined(CONFIGURE_EXECUTIVE_RAM_SIZE) && \
+     !defined(CONFIGURE_MEMORY_OVERHEAD)
+     #error "Using CONFIGURE_UNLIMITED_OBJECTS with a pre-calculated work space 
size makes no sense"
+  #endif
+
    #if !defined(CONFIGURE_UNLIMITED_ALLOCATION_SIZE)
    /**
     * This macro specifies a default allocation size for when auto-extending


The use case is (was?) a fixed size or bounded pool of memory that can be used in different ways depending on what is being run depending on how the app is configured. I am not fussed either way what happens here as the unified work areas is a nice feature.

Chris
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel

Reply via email to