On 4/16/2014 3:56 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > I updated the status subsections in the implementation section. Thanks but I am having trouble still trying to figure out what a short summary should be. I would like the summary table to have phrases like:
+ complete + basic functionality complete with future enhancements identified + no work done + in process + partially complete Picking on Low-level start (http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/SMP#Low-Level_Start) as an example, the Status is a description of the implementation. Beyond the single phrase "is guided by" which implies it does it now and no Future Directions, the description does not give one a hint as to what state this idea/task is in. My idea behind the summary table was to have a "red/green/yellow" view of everything that was identified at a glance. --joel > On 2014-04-15 18:15, Jeff Mayes wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I’m trying to create a table on the RTEMS Wiki to monitor the SMP >> implementation efforts. See http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/SMP. For >> anyone working in this area, would you please share the status of your >> efforts? >> Not looking for deep details, just high level comments about any ongoing >> and >> future implementation. >> >> Thanks >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rtems-devel mailing list >> rtems-devel@rtems.org >> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel >> > -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985 _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
