On 19/04/2014 4:51 am, Jennifer Averett wrote:


-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastian Huber [mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 1:49 PM
To: Jennifer Averett
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] score: Add validation that no extensions are null.

I think also that we
need a proper thread terminate event, since terminate and delete are now
different things.

I thought about adding a terminate event, but since the terminate is being
triggered by a delete of self it seemed the delete event would be the better
option.  The application user shouldn't have to understand the internals
to  understand the output from the capture engine (imo).


Please add a terminate event. The capture must report what happens and never imply anything. If they are the same thing or there are multiple events this should be what is reported.

Chris
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel

Reply via email to