On Apr 29, 2014 7:54 AM, "Ralf Corsepius" <ralf.corsep...@rtems.org> wrote: > > On 04/29/2014 05:20 AM, Hesham Moustafa wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> In the last few days, I have been working on porting newlib for >> or1k/rtems. Joel and Chris mentioned that the previous newlib port has >> some GPL code which conflicts with RTEMS; > > Which? I could be missing something, but I am not seeing such code in [1]. > By "previous newlib port" I mean this one https://github.com/heshamelmatary/or1k-rtems/blob/master/patches/newlib-2.1.0-or1k-rtems.diff I gave generated that patch against upstream or1k/newlib there https://github.com/openrisc/or1k-src?files=1 Which Chris and Joel cited about its illegal licence. > >> No libgloss stuff is being used. > > Correct. libgloss stuff is completely irrelevant wrt RTEMS. > > >> Please take a look, I would >> appreciate your feedback. > > > I am seeing one issue with newlib/libc/machine/or1k/setjmp.S > > It is not properly licensed. All it carries is this: > > +/* Simple setjmp/longjmp for the OpenRISC 1000 (OR32 ISA). > + Damjan Lampret, OpenCores.org, Aug 15 2000. */ > > You'll have to contact a legal copyright holder of this code (I'd guess Damjan Lampert or representative of opencores.org) and ask him to (re-) license this code under legal terms which are suitable to newlib. > > >> [1] http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~jab00/or32-newlib/newlib-patch >> [2] https://github.com/heshamelmatary/or1k-rtems/blob/master/patches/newlib-cvs-or1k-rtems-29-4-2014.diff >> [3] https://github.com/heshamelmatary/or1k-rtems/blob/master/patches/gcc-4.8.2-or1k-rtems-29-4-2014.diff > > > Ralf > > _______________________________________________ > rtems-devel mailing list > rtems-devel@rtems.org > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
_______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
