Ben,

Just reviewing interrupts now. I'm not sure your question fully makes sense. Unlike smaller embedded arms (eg. Cortex-M3), he interrupts on Cortex-A8 are two-phase. There is an external (to the ARM core) interrupt controller that feeds interrupts to the ARM IRQ and FIRQ lines. The ARM process itself actually only has those two interrupt signals.

It looks like the code currently handles IRQ and FIRQ serially, so any interrupts at each level would be handled serially regardless of priority set in the INTC. Presumably what we eventually want to do here for both IRQ and FIRQ handlers is, receive the interrupt, immediately set the INTC priority to the received interrupt level to block lower priority interrupts (including the current interrupt), then acknowledge IRQ/FIRQ and dispatch the actual interrupt handler at a lower CPU priority so we can nest IRQ/FIRQ and handle higher priority interrupts.

I'm not quite familiar with ARM family yet to be sure how this is normally accomplished or if there is an existing supported ARM with the same interrupt controller structure. TI provide sample source including interrupt handler that supports this stuff. It might be a good place to start playing with it, the source pretty much compiles fine in the RTEMS environment.

Chris.


On 28/04/2014 4:32 AM, Ben Gras wrote:
Dear all,

I have a question about managing interrupts in a BSP that I have not been able to answer satisfactorily by looking at other BSP code, nor looking throught the documentation or googling. Or asking on the IRC channel :)

My question is: are BSPs expected to allow nested interrupts? Specifically, must bsp_interrupt_dispatch() turn interrupts on before calling bsp_interrupt_handler_dispatch for everything else to work properly?

Some BSPs do this, some don't. In the Beagle BSP I can do this by masking the currently active interrupt and then enabling them at the CPU level; but enabling all interrupts before the hw-specific handler is called won't deassert the irq at the peripheral so I'm having trouble seeing how that should work.

Example: if we are in a timer ISR and loop on polling the uptime ticks, do we expect the ticks to be able to increase? I'm wondering if any of the remaining failing tests are due to this. But also what the best shape of a BSP is.

Thanks!


_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel

_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel

Reply via email to