Yes, we made this patch in order to the testsuites work correctly. So you think we should change the macro value in cpu.h and arm.h as i proposed before?
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Sebastian Huber <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2014-06-04 23:05, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> FWIW I wrote the confdefs.h part and Marcos wrote the documentation. >> He spotted a typo and missed that also. > > > I am not sure if the BSP should be responsible for a default task stack > size. The BSP has nothing to do with the code generation and the general > architecture specifics that determine the typical stack usage. > > Which problem does this new define address? Is this the test suite? In > case the tests pass with a stack size of 1024 on this BSP, then they will > pass on all ARM BSPs using the same instruction set. > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : [email protected] > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > > _______________________________________________ > rtems-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel -- ______________________________ Marcos Díaz Software Engineer San Lorenzo 47, 3rd Floor, Office 5 Córdoba, Argentina Phone: +54 351 4217888 / +54 351 4218211/ +54 351 7617452 Skype: markdiaz22 _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
