Jeff, I have BFD over VXLAN to present in coming IETF. I have plans presenting this both in Nov3 and BFD working group.
Thanks Santosh P K > -----Original Message----- > From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 3:31 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: IETF 93, shall we meet? > > Working Group, > > IETF 93 is proving to be very popular, and the IETF has more requests for > timeslots than can be possibly served from the pool of available ones. I had > registered the WG for its usual 1 hour session a few weeks ago. > > Given the competition for scheduling, I must ask you all this question: > Shall we meet? > > The mailing list has been quiet, but work has been going on. For example: > - The BFD Yang design team has been very busy on their latest version. > (Provide them feedback!) > - The S-BFD have completed WGLC and are waiting for the last IPR > attestations before going to shepherd write-up. > - 5884 clarifications have passed IPR attestations, but didn't get enough > support to move the document forward. We'll be trying again soon after > some last minute comments are addressed. > > In non-chartered work: > - BFD stability has had a new edition published. > - BFD authentication optimizations is available for discussion. > - BFD for VXLan was published for discussion. > > Minimally, the chairs will be requesting status updates for active work. > This status need not be presented. > > As always, Working Group session time should be reserved for *active > discussion*. Thus if you believe we have work that requires such active > discussion, let us know. > > -- Jeff
