On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:30:03PM +0000, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote: > > > On Jul 10, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> What is the target timeline for submitting these to the IESG? > > > > Likely the next day or so. > > Thank you, Jeff!
True to my general nature, my days follow the timelines that many software developers mean when they say "just a few days". In other words, the caveat is, "when I can work on that without interruption". Such a precious illusion. With apologies to the Working Group, I've completed the document shepherd writeup for the S-BFD document set and have submitted the drafts for IESG publication. One minor issue was noted during the writeup - that being the normative reference on a spring document that still hasn't been accepted as a working group document in spring. Based on how this use case is being used to support a particular use case in Seamless BFD, a normative reference is appropriate. However, since both documents are targeted for Informational status, an Informative reference may be similarly appropriate. The authors of Seamless BFD should consider whether a change in status may be appropriate as it would remove an obstacle to publication as an RFC. -- Jeff
