Jeff, I think " draft-ymbk-idr-rs-bfd " already a working group document?
Thanks Santosh P K > -----Original Message----- > From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas > Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 2:16 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Working group status > > The working group has been quiet. Certainly I've been a bit distracted, and > Nobo even more so! > > I've taken this opportunity to prod a few document authors to move their > work along. > > I've also spent some time updating the WG wiki with current perceived WG > status. If you have a BFD document, please check the wiki and make sure > the status seems correct. If your document is marked expired, then it means > you're not pushing your proposal very hard! > > https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/bfd/trac/wiki/WikiStart > > The multipoint documents, presuming the WG agrees, are likely to hit WGLC > soon. Please review them and provide feedback. > > This is also a reminder that in terms of chartered work, the Yang module > could use WG attention. The design team has done an excellent job getting > us this far - help them get to the finish line. > > Finally, our need to do presentations at the upcoming IETF session in > Yokohama will be based on *active* work with discussion on the mailing list. > This means that now, in this quiet time between IETFs, is a perfect time to > try > to get the attention of your fellow BFD experts. > > -- Jeff
