Given the very low quantity of responses (1, not counting authors) and since this is a meeting week, I'll extend the WG Last Call another week until Monday Nov/9/2015.
Hopefully, by then, more people may have found the time to read this very short draft and answer yeah/nay. Thanks all, -Ignacio L2tpext chair >At 09:39 10/19/2015, Ignacio Goyret wrote: >>Hi group, >> >>This email starts a two-week Working-Group Last-Call (WGLC) for >>draft-ietf-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator-00 >>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator/ >> >>Please send comments to the list and state whether or not you support >>progressing this document (in the later case, please also state the >>reasons). Silence is not indication of support. >> >>This poll runs until ** November 3rd, 2015 **. >> >>We are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this >>draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with >>IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >> >>* If you are listed as a document author or contributor *, please >>respond only if you are aware of any changes to IPR from your >>response during the poll for adoption, at >>http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2tpext/current/msg01389.html >> >>If you are *not* listed as an author or contributor, then please >>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not >>yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >> >>Thank you, >> >>Carlos and Ignacio >>L2tpext co-chairs >> >>_______________________________________________ >>L2tpext mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext > >_______________________________________________ >L2tpext mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext
