Will resubmit as draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication. Thanks.
> On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > This document has passed adoption as BFD WG document. > > Usual practice would be to resubmit as draft-ietf-bfd-authentication, however > that could be a bit confusing. How about > draft-ietf-bfd-authentication-optimization or > draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication? > > Regards, > Jeff & Reshad. > > From: Rtg-bfd <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on > behalf of Reshad <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Friday, November 20, 2015 at 7:03 AM > To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Request for WG adoption of draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication > > BFD WG members, > > Please indicate to the WG mailing list whether you would support or not > support BFD WG adoption of the following document. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication/> > > Authors, as was mentioned at IETF94, you should get your proposal reviewed by > the security group. > > Regards, > Jeff & Reshad. > <Mail Attachment.eml> Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
