> On Dec 8, 2015, at 9:40 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:36:29PM +0000, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote: >> On 12/6/15, 4:09 AM, "Santosh P K" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Unless I missed something, Carlos [1] didn't reply to #1: how are the use >> cases satisfied? I'm looking forward to an updated version of >> I-D.ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case which may help. > > My understanding is that the use case draft is unlikely to proceed. With > your blessing even. How do you want the text here adjusted?
How about: OLD: This document extends BFD to provide solutions to use cases listed in [I-D.ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case]. NEW: <null> ? Thanks, — Carlos. > > -- Jeff
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
