Hi Marc, Its been a long time since we played bfd-bfd, eh ?! :-)
> S-BFD draft. You can look at Sec 3.8 of > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-03#page-7 > to > > understand why we may want to support multiple discriminators per node. > > ah, that problem :-) > Yup, my lord. And i was convinced by some folks working for the same vendor to include the possibility of supporting multiple discriminators per node since the line cards can keep conking off ! ;-) > > > My considered opinion is to strike that off from the base draft and move > > on, since S-BFD solves a real problem and should not be stalled for > > something that may never end up getting implemented. > > So OSPF, IS-IS, L2TP could transport a single discriminator instead of a > list? > Yup, that would be the flavor of my argument. Cheers, Manav > > Regards, Marc > >
