Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-04: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I think that these are both simple fast issues to resolve. 1) Sec 3: "This document defines only the UDP port value for the S-BFD Echo function. The source port and the procedures for the S-BFD Echo function are outside the scope of this document." Please add a reference to the S-BFD base document for defining where the procedures are found. Where, precisely, is the source port defined? It wasn't in the S-BFD base document. This seems like a hole. Can you please clarify? 2) Sec 4: " If the port is not 7784, then the packet MUST be looked up to locate a corresponding SBFDInitiator session or classical BFD session based on the value from the "your discriminator" field in the table describing BFD discriminators. " I assume that you mean that UDP source port is used to look up the appropriate receiver. If that receiver handles BFD and S-BFD packets, then the "your discriminator" field is used to identify the BFD session. PLEASE clarify that because this reads as if BFD is the only application that uses UDP.
