Thank you for this comment, Mirja. You have a good point, we will add it. Thumb typed by Carlos Pignataro. Excuze typofraphicak errows
> On May 3, 2016, at 03:50, Mirja Kuehlewind <[email protected]> wrote: > > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-06: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > While this document has a security requirement, I believe there is also a > risk of misconfiguration: if no handshake is performed, a node might send > S-BFD packets to a receiver that does not exists or is not aware of it or > sits at a different part of the network that is somewhere else than > expected which can overload the network accidentally. Should this be > mentioned in this doc (or somewhere else... or both)? > >
