Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-05: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 5.1, 6.1: The IPv4-mapped IPv6 prefix for the IPv4 loopback range 127.0.0.0/8 is incorrect. It is currently written as 0:0:0:0:0:FFFF:7F00/104. It should instead be 0:0:0:0:0:FFFF:7F00:0/104. Sections 5.1, 6.1: The document just talks about the TTL field being set to 255. It does not talk about the Hop Limit field for IPv6. I would assume you want to do the same for IPv6 packets as for the IPv4 packets. Can you include the Hop Limit as well if you want the same behavior for IPv6. I have two suggested forms of changes. Pick whatever works better for you. OLD: TTL field of the IP header SHOULD be set to 255 NEW: The TTL/Hop Limit field of the IP header SHOULD be set to 255 (or) The TTL field of the IPv4 header or the Hop Limit field of the IPv6 header SHOULD be set to 255
