Hi Chairs, BFD community, two drafts, draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-ip and draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-mpls*, * were referred to BFD WG in BA that clarify use of micro-BFD over MC-LAG interfaces in IP and IP/MPLS network respectively. Authors would appreciate opportunity to present and discuss.
Regards, Greg On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > IETF 96 will be convening in Berlin July 17-22. BFD has not met recently, > but our face to face meetings are driven by the need to advance work via > in-person discussion. > > The chairs' perceived status of the Working Group is tracked on our wiki: > https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/bfd/trac/wiki > > Most of the recent WG attention has been spent on finishing IESG comments > for S-BFD and we should hopefully be well on the way through the RFC Editor > by the upcoming IETF, IESG telechat permitting. Our active work includes: > > - BFD Yang module (please comment!) > - BFD Multipoint (likely WGLC ready with at least one implementation for > the > base document, and a trill use case for active tail). > - Optimizing BFD Authentication - needs further discussion with security > minded IETFers. > > We also have BFD related documents targeted for other WGs where we should > consider providing comment, if needed: > > - BFD Directed Return Path (in MPLS), stalled. > - draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd > - draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd > - draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan (possibly BFD, possibly NVO3) > > And several other WG documents that are chartered but stalled (or dead?) > > If you believe you have an agenda item that's cause for the Working Group > to > meet, please respond to this thread. > > -- Jeff and Reshad > >
