Thanks Dave, that’s what I thought, Shahram
> On Feb 22, 2017, at 12:16 PM, Dave Katz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Right, the only point of the poll sequence when changing timing is to keep > the session from timing out (because, for example, the transmit rate was > reduced but the receiver didn’t yet know that the holding time was being > extended). > > In this case, the session is already down, so you can’t do too much damage to > it. > > —Dave > >> On Feb 22, 2017, at 12:03 PM, [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: >> >> In my understanding based on 5+ Implementations I have seen, you NEED NOT. >> >> When state moves to down, simply reduce the rate yourself. >> >> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows >> 10 >> >> From: Shahram Davari <mailto:[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 1:31 AM >> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> Subject: BFD interval in down state >> >> Hi >> >> When moving from UP to down state we are supposed to reduce the rate to 1 >> sec. Do we need to do a poll sequence to reduce the rate? >> >> Regards, >> Shahram >
